Aero Wheels Vs Lightweight Wheels

As cyclists we know that deep aero wheels are usually faster than lighter shallower wheels when riding on flat roads.

Aero wheels vs lightweight wheels.

Everything i ve read seems to suggest that aero come into play more at higher speeds but given that most of my racing is on relatively fast circuits that might make most sense. Pretty standard and typical. Two wheels with the same depth. It got me thinking about the whole aero vs light wheel thing and about wheels in general time for a brain fart so aero wheels.

Close enough to be identical. Despite all of the braking and accelerating in a criterium however heavier higher inertia deep section aero wheels still have a clear advantage over lightweight shallow rim wheels according. A 900g aero frame will be faster than a 900g non aero frame. The higher profile rims will weigh more but they ll be stronger too.

As for aero compared to weight that question was decided many many years ago. And we know that when climbing very steep roads lighter wheels will be. Who knows they might let you keep up with that tt group. There are wheels like the planet x carbon 50 s which fit the bill and budget up to 450 maybe a.

I do not see why you can not have both. The lighter tubulars accelerated quicker and the heavier clinchers kept momentum better. Even on the 13 2km alpe d huez climb the lightweight wheels bettered the ultimate aero combo by just. A 1100g aero wheelset will be faster than a 1100g non aero wheelset.

If you re riding between 14 19 mph you re right on the verge of getting a nice boost from aero wheels too. Clinchers weigh 350 grams more than the tubulars. Zipp s firecrest and enve s ses smart enve system i think are the current hot topics on the aero front each claiming their wheel is better for particular reasons. What are the prospective merits of lightweight versus aero wheels.